Tag Archives: Proust

Proust says . . .

Proust says memory is of two kinds.

There is the daily struggle to recall

where we put our reading glasses

 


and there is a deeper gust of longing

that comes up from the bottom

of the heart

involuntarily

At sudden times

For surprise reasons.

 

Here is an excerpt from a letter Proust wrote

In 1913

We think we no longer love our dead

 

But that is because we do not remember them;

Suddenly

We catch sight of an old glove

 

And burst into tears.

 

– Anne Carson, Float

Leave a Comment

Filed under memories

The writer attacks his manuscript

‘This is curious’, said M’sieur Pierre.’ What are these hopes, and who is this saviour?

‘Imagination,’ replied Cincinnatus

Vladimir Nabokov, Invitation to a Beheading

In an email to a friend last year I wrote: “I’m struggling to move my novel forward. It’s giving me a hard time at the moment. But they always make us pay our dues sooner or later. So this is not really unexpected. After all, I’ve been having a good run with it for quite a while. Now for some deeper probing. The problem with the book is my own doing. I can’t bear to take the material for granted; and having written a draft I have to begin questioning it and erasing it. I don’t seem to be able to do it any other way. I’m not as persistent as Giacometti in erasing my works in progress, but I do understand Giacometti’s visceral reluctance to believe in what he had created until it had begun to shine for him with a kind of light that was not his own. Without this sense of surprise about what we have done there is no mystery in what we do. And I happen to agree with the spirit of Lorca’s “only mystery makes us live.” So here I am again this morning attacking what I’ve done so far with this book as if it were the work of my deadly enemy and I were determined to tear it to pieces.’

. . . .

Inspiration, that igniting of the imagination that enables is to write beyond ourselves, so that our work shines for us with a light that is not our own, is most often an inner response to a stimulus from outside, some trivial event that triggers memory and alters our mood. It is the source of Lorca’s mystery. It is what sustains our interest. But when we consciously go in search of inspiration, it stubbornly eludes us. I’ll let Proust have the final word on this:

. . . one knocks at all the doors which lead nowhere, and then one stumbles without knowing it on the only door through which one can enter— which one might have sought in vain for a hundred years – and it opens of its own accord.

 Alex Miller, John Masefield’s Attic, in The Best Australian Essays 2010, ed. Robert Drew (here) 

 

Comments Off on The writer attacks his manuscript

Filed under the writing process